Traction analysis

Where is it stuck? What changes first? Who executes?

The starting point for cross-functional problems where a lot of work produces too little impact.

The outcome

Three things become clear.

1

Where impact is lost.

The bottleneck becomes visible through real cases, handoffs, data and decisions.

2

What changes first.

The leverage point with the greatest business impact gets a clear priority.

3

How execution starts.

Ownership, next step and the right execution path become concrete.

ScopeWe define which functions and cases are in scope before the start.
TimingThe time frame is clear before work begins.
PriceThe price is agreed transparently before the start.

How we find the leverage point

Four steps from friction to decision.

Follow a real case

A concrete commercial case shows how work really moves through the company.

Locate friction

Waiting, information loss, rework and dependencies become visible.

Prioritize leverage

Business impact, effort and dependencies determine the order.

Define the target state

The next flow becomes concrete enough for ownership and execution to start.

What is on the table

Clarity that enables a decision.

Bottleneck

Where the current flow loses time, margin, quality or speed.

Priority

Which leverage point changes first so the same effort creates more impact.

Execution path

Who owns what, in which order and toward which target state.

Next

The analysis ends with an actionable decision.

Execute internally

The team owns the clearly defined next step.

Workshop

Stakeholders build the new flow or decision together.

Project leadership

I lead cross-functional execution to the agreed outcome.

Interim + specialists

Temporary ownership and targeted expertise close the execution gap.

Which problem blocks the most right now?

Describe the situation. That is enough to define a useful analysis scope.

Describe the problem →
Describe the problem →